首页> 外文OA文献 >Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline
【2h】

Colorectal polypectomy and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR): European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Clinical Guideline

机译:大肠息肉切除术和内窥镜黏膜切除术(EMR):欧洲胃肠道内窥镜学会(ESGE)临床指南

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

1 ESGE recommends cold snare polypectomy (CSP) as the preferred technique for removal of diminutive polyps (size ≤ 5 mm). This technique has high rates of complete resection, adequate tissue sampling for histology, and low complication rates. (High quality evidence, strong recommendation.) 2 ESGE suggests CSP for sessile polyps 6 - 9 mm in size because of its superior safety profile, although evidence comparing efficacy with hot snare polypectomy (HSP) is lacking. (Moderate quality evidence, weak recommendation.) 3 ESGE suggests HSP (with or without submucosal injection) for removal of sessile polyps 10 - 19 mm in size. In most cases deep thermal injury is a potential risk and thus submucosal injection prior to HSP should be considered. (Low quality evidence, strong recommendation.) 4 ESGE recommends HSP for pedunculated polyps. To prevent bleeding in pedunculated colorectal polyps with head ≥ 20 mm or a stalk ≥ 10 mm in diameter, ESGE recommends pretreatment of the stalk with injection of dilute adrenaline and/or mechanical hemostasis. (Moderate quality evidence, strong recommendation.) 5 ESGE recommends that the goals of endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) are to achieve a completely snare-resected lesion in the safest minimum number of pieces, with adequate margins and without need for adjunctive ablative techniques. (Low quality evidence; strong recommendation.) 6 ESGE recommends careful lesion assessment prior to EMR to identify features suggestive of poor outcome. Features associated with incomplete resection or recurrence include lesion size > 40 mm, ileocecal valve location, prior failed attempts at resection, and size, morphology, site, and access (SMSA) level 4. (Moderate quality evidence; strong recommendation.) 7 For intraprocedural bleeding, ESGE recommends endoscopic coagulation (snare-tip soft coagulation or coagulating forceps) or mechanical therapy, with or without the combined use of dilute adrenaline injection. (Low quality evidence, strong recommendation.)An algorithm of polypectomy recommendations according to shape and size of polyps is given (Fig. 1)
机译:1 ESGE建议使用冷圈套息肉切除术(CSP)作为去除微小息肉(≤5 mm)的首选技术。该技术具有较高的完全切除率,足够的组织样本进行组织学检查以及较低的并发症发生率。 (高质量的证据,强烈推荐。)2 ESGE建议将CSP用于尺寸在6-9 mm的无蒂息肉,因为其优越的安全性,尽管尚缺乏与热圈套息肉切除术(HSP)进行疗效比较的证据。 (中等质量的证据,不推荐。)3 ESGE建议使用HSP(有或无黏膜下注射)去除大小为10-19 mm的无蒂息肉。在大多数情况下,深层热损伤是潜在的风险,因此应考虑在HSP之前进行粘膜下注射。 (低质量证据,强烈推荐。)4 ESGE建议带蒂息肉使用HSP。为防止头部直径≥20 mm或蒂直径≥10 mm的带蒂大肠息肉出血,ESGE建议通过注射稀肾上腺素和/或机械止血来对茎进行预处理。 (中等质量的证据,强烈推荐。)5 ESGE建议内窥镜黏膜切除术(EMR)的目标是在最安全的最小数量内实现完全圈套切除的病变,并留有足够的余量,而无需辅助消融技术。 (证据质量低下;强烈推荐。)6 ESGE建议在EMR前仔细评估病灶,以发现提示不良预后的特征。与不完全切除或复发相关的特征包括病变大小> 40 mm,回盲瓣位置,先前切除失败的尝试以及大小,形态,部位和通路(SMSA)4级。(中等质量证据;强烈推荐。)7对于术中出血,ESGE建议内镜下凝结(薄纱片软凝结或凝结钳)或机械疗法,或不联合使用稀肾上腺素注射液。 (证据质量低,强烈推荐。)根据息肉的形状和大小推荐了一种息肉切除术的建议算法(图1)

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号